
Mercedes SLK-Class AMG wheel fitment — SLK 55 R171
Mercedes SLK-Class AMG wheel fitment
Mercedes SLK-Class AMG wheel fitment for the Mercedes SLK 55 R171 (2004–2011): the factory PCD, centre bore and bolt spec, then the aftermarket width and offset window we fit to.
| Bolt pattern (PCD) | 5x112 |
| Centre bore | 66.6 mm |
| Bolt / thread | M14x1.5 (bolts) |
| Wheel-bolt torque | 110 Nm |
| Seat type | radius |
| Factory setup | staggered |
| TPMS | direct |
| Run-flat | Yes |
Aftermarket wheel sizes — read per position:
| Position | Width | Offset |
|---|---|---|
| Front | 6J–6.5J | ET40–ET60 |
| Rear (staggered) | 7.3J–9J | ET35–ET55 |
Go wider and the offset has to rise with it, about 8 to 10 ET per extra 1J, or the wheel pokes past the arch. The fit-check settles the exact offset and any spacer.
Overview
The Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class R171 is a compact executive roadster produced from 2004 to 2010, succeeding the first generation (R170) and preceding the third generation (R172). It was unveiled at the 2004 Geneva Motor Show. The R171 features increased use of high-strength steel for improved torsional strength and aerodynamic efficiency. Its roof mechanism is more compact, reducing the time to operate from 25 seconds to 22 seconds and increasing boot capacity by 63 liters (2.2 cu ft). It also introduced the Airscarf system that provides neck-level heating through headrests. The front-end design was inspired by Formula One car noses.
Body styles & production
| Produced | 2004–2011 |
Trim levels
Factory colours
History & notable variants
The R171 SLK-Class underwent a facelift in 2008, featuring new engines and minor exterior changes to celebrate its fifth year of production. This generation saw the introduction of various performance variants such as the AMG models which offered enhanced power and handling characteristics.
Reliability & owner notes
- Pros: Improved torsional rigidity, compact roof mechanism with faster operation and increased boot space, innovative Airscarf system for comfort in open-top driving.
- Cons: Limited interior space due to the roadster design, higher maintenance costs compared to sedans.